I keep my pearls slung over the shoulder of a small copy of Michaelangelo's David - it keeps him decent and they're always to hand! I think your lady looks beautiful with the pearls - just don't add the eyepatch, a la St. Trinians! xxx
With or without....they both give a very distinct feel of this lovely piece. She looks lonely without them. With them she seems happy. Or at least that's the way I see it. She is very pretty for whatever you decide. Happy days to you, Miss Bee! Brenda
Well, I think that she has a more classic beauty without the pearls, but on special occasions she should wear them...after all, every woman needs to dress up once in a while.
.jpg)
.jpg)
I like both options - but I like with the pearls better, a lady always needs jewellery! Hope you are having a lovely week x
ReplyDeleteI quite like the simplicity of nude but, do try them a few days and then take them off and see if you prefer them or not.
ReplyDeleteI am your swap partner for the Diamond Jubilee swap. I will email you separately about it though.
Have a great week,
Sandie xx
Just noticed you haven't got your email on your profile!
ReplyDeleteMine is on my profile if you want to email me and we can 'chat' about the swap.
Sandie xx
I keep my pearls slung over the shoulder of a small copy of Michaelangelo's David - it keeps him decent and they're always to hand! I think your lady looks beautiful with the pearls - just don't add the eyepatch, a la St. Trinians! xxx
ReplyDeleteI prefer with...I wonder what you will decide?! :0)
ReplyDeleteI like her simplicity when she is bare,perhaps you can follow the on and off days by one of the other ladies...she is quite lovely isn't she.
ReplyDeleteMmmmm, I tend to think more is less, for me maybe smaller pearls and just one strand? :) xx
ReplyDeleteWith or without....they both give a very distinct feel of this lovely piece. She looks lonely without them. With them she seems happy. Or at least that's the way I see it. She is very pretty for whatever you decide.
ReplyDeleteHappy days to you, Miss Bee!
Brenda
I think without - or maybe one very plain string?! xx
ReplyDeleteI think without too.
ReplyDeleteKandi x
Definitely without, she is just gorgeous as she is.
ReplyDeleteDefinetly with pearls, Lucey x
ReplyDeleteDefinitely with, she looks gorgeous! Tam x
ReplyDeletep.s the printed version of your book looks great!
I find her prettier without, although I do like the pearls!
ReplyDeleteWith but a simpler string?
ReplyDeleteWithout.
ReplyDeletei like her au natural x
ReplyDeleteLike them both, but with better! Hugs
ReplyDeleteI prefer her without adornment.
ReplyDeleteI would say without or if you were to want her wearing pearls maybe with fewer pearls, she is beautiful x x x x
ReplyDeleteI think she looks lovely either way... but as she is so beautiful I think I am going to say without!
ReplyDeleteHope you are having a good week,
Susan x
I think she looks lov1ey with the pearls..though either way is nice :)
ReplyDeleteI'll say: without! Love the natural way! Have nice day!
ReplyDeleteWell, I think that she has a more classic beauty without the pearls, but on special occasions she should wear them...after all, every woman needs to dress up once in a while.
ReplyDeleteHave a delightfully buzzing day,
Hugs,
Marianne
I think I prefer her unadorned.
ReplyDeleteShe is classically pretty without, but the pearls is quite fun if you needed to store them anyway.
ReplyDeleteWithout or with pink pearls..lol
ReplyDeleteHello, Deb,
ReplyDeleteI'd like to feature your new book on my blog in my next post. Is that ok with you?
Marianne
Oh, I love your lady, and yes, the pearls make her lovely.
ReplyDelete~Sheri at Red Rose Alley
My vote from the other side of the pond...without.
ReplyDeleteVery nice.
with or without, the lady is still gorgeous! hehe i'm as undecided as you are, bee! hehe
ReplyDeletexx susan